Mid Anglia Group, Richard III Society

Archive for the tag “Richard III”

The inspiration for Richard III’s rosary….

murreyandblue

The following article and extract are from Nerdalicious:

“ ‘In the nineteenth century the Clare Cross was found in the castle ruins. It’s actually a reliquary, containing a fragment of the True Cross, and it was probably made soon after 1450  so probably it belonged to Richard III’s mother. For that reason, when I got an agreement from Leicester Cathedral for a rosary to be buried with Richard III I chose a quite large, black wooden rosary which I bought years ago, when I was a student at the University of East Anglia, in Norwich. Then I had the cross and the central link replaced by George Easton (who made Richard III’s funeral crown for me too). George copied the Clare Cross for me, to replace the original crucifix, and he also made an enamelled white rose (like the ones he made for Richard’s crown) to replace the central link. A…

View original post 33 more words

Advertisements

Richard III in Parliament

As Ricardians, you will all be aware of Matthew Lewis and many of you will have attended is talks or read his books. He is a member of the Richard III Society and a passionate advocate of our king’s good name and reputation.
I asked Matt to write something for our newsletter and I hope you will all enjoy it.

When writing my biography of Richard III (this will be the one and only plug, I promise!), I wanted to focus sharply on his parliament in 1484. As a result, and to give it more depth and context, his youth and time in he north dominated more of the story than his time as king because I wanted to see if it was possible to tie some of the actions of the parliament that have been widely praised directly to Richard. Detractors are quick to claim it was just the machinery of government in a way no one says about Henry VIII’s Reformation Parliament. Ricardians are keen to hold it up as evidence of Richard’s potential for good government, so I wanted to see which of these was supported by the evidence, or indeed whether the truth lay somewhere on a scale between the two.

Parliament opened at Westminster on 23 January 1484 and closed on 20 February, sitting for just twenty-nine days. The composition of Richard’s parliament remains largely obscured, and perhaps that should be no surprise. This session would pass Titulus Regius, and anyone wanting to make their way in Henry VII’s England after 1485 would hardly want to be associated with making his queen a bastard. William Catesby was elected Speaker, probably to please Richard, Dr Thomas Hutton was Clerk to the Parliament and Thomas Barowe was Master of the Rolls, but no other details have survived.

Bishop Russell, the Chancellor, drafted a speech for the opening of Parliament which we can only assume was delivered. Russell had drafted speeches for Edward V’s abandoned Parliament and the session Richard’s planned sitting in November, abandoned because of the October Rebellions. The draft speech likened the country to a human body, and contains language that seems to fit closely with Richard’s interest in equitable justice for those lower down the social ladder during his time in the north. Russell would say that within the body ‘no membre, be he never so nobille, that may sey to the leste or to the vilest of them all, I have no nede of thee’. The evil advise given to Edward IV by his counsellors led, Russell planned to say, to the blindness of the body: ‘was not hys pensissous sikenesse encreced by dayly remembraunce of the derke weys, that hys subtille feythe frendes had lede hym in?’

Russell’s speech would then go on to tell the Parable of the Lost Coin, in which a woman has ten coins and looses one. She searches her house and sweeps it clean to find what was lost, and when it is recovered, she calls together all her friends and neighbours to celebrate. The story appears along with the Parables of the Lost Sheep and the Prodigal Son to explain God’s attitude to sinners. Blinded and having lost part of what made it whole, England could not be complete, secure or just. Parliament, Russell would assert, was the place to put things right: ‘We be yn the place where thys shuld be tretyd. Thys tyme ys prefixed for the same entente.’

Russell redrafted his speech in January, but what remains is only fragmentary. One of the surviving lines is cryptic, but perhaps means nothing. The application of hindsight and the question of the fate of Edward IV’s sons might give it meaning that the writer did not intend, but Richard is frequently criticised for failing to explain what happened to his nephews if he had nothing to hide. One line of Russell’s draft explains that ‘There be many children, many menne of divers condicions and estates, yn thys Reame of England whoyse body muste be preservyd.’ Was this an allusion to the fact that his nephews were safe somewhere, a careful response to the rumours of October that would not reveal their location?

Once the session began, Parliament’s first business was taxation, granting Richard what he needed to run the country. Titulus Regius was passed into law next, confirming the events of June 1483 and Richard’s title as king. Other private bills mopped up outstanding issues and attainted rebels from October, as well as correcting an injustice Richard perceived in the dealings of his brother with his sister Anne, her daughter and the Duchy of Exeter. Parliament abolished benevolences, a system of arbitrary taxation Edward IV had introduced in 1475 to fund the French Campaign and had enjoyed using so much he had continued until it was despised. The public bills, though, were the real meat of the business and are where Richard might be most clearly seen at work. They were largely separated into those dealing with trade and those addressing matters of justice.

When it came to matters of trade, Parliament addressed issues around the size and quality of cloth and insisted on the importing of properly quality bow staves with other goods to ensure that the English military was not weakened by cheap imports. Foreign merchants were restricted from operating certain trades in England and were charged far greater duties than their English counterparts. Italian merchants came in for particularly harsh attention. They were required to sell all of their goods to English subjects at cost price. Not only that, but they had to then spend their money on goods from English merchants before leaving Richard’s shores. I’m not sure what they had done to upset Richard, but they were certainly singled out for special attention.

These measures were demonstrably in line with Richard’s attitude to trade when he was in the north. For example, he tried to secure treatment for northern merchants that would place them on a par with the favourable terms London merchants enjoyed on the continent. Edward refused to permit that but did allow some tax breaks to ease his rejection of the request. I am left wondering whether Richard had some grand plan to reduce the influence of the nobility, whose power, autonomy and tendencies to use corrupt methods as part of the system of livery and maintenance offended him. The rising merchant class might have been the perfect foil, strengthened to counteract the nobility. If so, it was a policy that Henry VII would identify with and pursue.

Justice is perhaps where we can see Richard implementing his previous policies and interests most clearly. Aside from land law reform, there was a focus on bail reform. Richard did not, as has long been suggested in some quarters, invent bail, which was mentioned as early as 1275 in the Statutes of Westminster. What was enacted in 1484 was significant reform to bail. Parliament now made it law that bail could no longer be denied where it had previously been withheld, and also prevented the seizure of goods before a guilty verdict. It seems that men’s property, which might be the tools of their trade or all they had to provide for their family, were being seized when they were arrested and were not always returned after an innocent verdict. This is a reform perfectly aligned to Richard’s interests in justice and the championing of the common man against his social superiors during his time in the north.

Parliament also addressed the issue of jury composition. In a move that might sound harsh to modern ears, when everyone is entitled to sit on a jury, Parliament set restrictions on those qualified to appear. Jurors were required to hold freehold land in the same county as the court sat worth at least 20s a year, or copyhold worth 26s 8d a year. Those appointing jurors were to be fined 40s for each unqualified member appointed. The issue that this was targeted at was the corruption rife in courts, bought by those able to pay off or intimidate jurors who were unable to stick up for themselves, or who were so poor that they could not resist the bribes. Richard’s Parliament cut off this path to corruption by making sure jury members were harder to buy off or bully. This concern for the common man was also prevalent in Richard’s behaviour in the north, demonstrated by his involvement in the problems of fishgarths, handing over his own retainers to face justice and writing to advise men that he had found in favour of their social inferiors against them in legal disputes.

Richard III’s only Parliament offers a small, narrow glimpse of the king he might have planned to be, but it is also the best view we can get. The Parliament and its legislation are often overlooked, but they demonstrate a continuation of a decade of policy in the north. The problem is that Richard was clumsy in trying to translate his radical ideas to the national stage. He had been working in a single region, with his brother to protect him. On a national stage, exposed and solely responsible, he failed to take correct account of the reaction of the nobility and gentry, those with the most to lose from a rebalancing of the political scales.

When looking for reasons why local gentry turned against Richard in October 1483 and why so many nobles failed to fight for him at Bosworth, it is tempting to look to the traditional reason; that people believed he had murdered his nephews. A more logical explanation, and one which fits the evidence much better, is that Richard’s reforms threatened those with too much to lose. He hadn’t put his counter measures in place before making his policies known and the loss of the support of the nobles and gentry was still too damaging to his cause for him to succeed. It shows a political naivety that I think Richard shared with his father, an inability to see the motives of those around him and a willingness to blindly believe they were honest and honourable, because he was, and he expected others to be.

Remembering …

this interview exactly six years ago, on Radio 4’s “Today”, between Evan Davis and John

Ricardian Bulletin articles available online

 The Richard III Society

Promoting research into the life and times of Richard III since 1924
Patron: HRH The Duke of Gloucester KG GCVO
Bringing you the latest important news and events about Richard III.

society head

Dear Members,

The Ricardian Bulletin, the Society’s quarterly members’ magazine, publishes a number of historical articles in each issue. These are invariably of high quality, often reflecting fresh research into, or new interpretations of, fifteenth century history as it relates to Richard III and his life and times. To enable these articles to reach a wider readership we are making a selection available on the Society’s website.

Too often the narrative of King Richard’s life is dominated by questions over how he became king and the fate of the two sons of Edward IV. The selection made available seeks to redress this imbalance and highlight some of the positive and less well known aspects of the king’s life: his strong belief in personal loyalty, his commitment to the fair application of the law, his abilities as an administrator and military commander and his religious faith. We also explore the influence of his father, Richard duke of York and the visit of Nicolas von Popplau to the king’s court in 1484.

Articles currently available are:
Richard III and the Men who Died in Battle by the late Lesley Boatwright, the late Moira Habberjam and Peter Hammond.
Like father, like son: Richard, duke of York and Richard III by Matthew Lewis.
Richard III and St Ninian by Sandra Pendlington
Richard III and ‘our poor subject Katherine Bassingbourne  by David Johnson
Richard III and Scotland by David Santiuste
The loveliest music and the Turkish frontier itself: von Popplau’s day with King Richard by Marie Barnfield

Over time we will be adding further articles from the Bulletin’s archive to the Society’s website.
Wishing you all a happy and healthy 2019.
Executive Committee
Richard III Society

Alex Marchant writes:

Alex Marchant is author of two novels, The Order of the White Boar and The King’s Man, together telling the story of the last three years in the life of King Richard III for readers aged 10+. The Order has been called ‘a wonderful work of historical fiction … altogether an enjoyable book for both children and adults’ by the Ricardian Bulletin and both it and The King’s Man can be bought as paperback or ebook through Amazon at myBook.to/WhiteBoar or through the author at AlexMarchant84@gmail.com.
Day one, first stop on my “Author Tour of Major Battlefields and Other Places Associated with my Major Character….” Barnet, Battle of. 1471.
At the end of last year, as author of a newly published children’s book about King Richard III, with a sequel due out in the spring, I realized I would have to start promotional activities if I wanted to sell any copies. Part of my planning involved identifying events where I might be able to have a stall. Middleham and Bosworth were top of my list, being festivals I’d been to at least once before. I also knew of the Tewkesbury medieval festival and, given that ‘the-battles-of-Barnet-and-Tewkesbury’ is a phrase that often trips off the tongue without much thought, I wondered whether there would be a similar event in the place that played host to the King’s first battle.
I was in luck. In fact, before I’d even begun looking in to it, I was contacted by the secretary of the newly formed Barnet Battlefield 1471 Society, Liz Bown, who’d heard about publication of The Order of the White Boar, to ask if I would supply copies for the Society to sell at its busy programme of events. And would I perhaps like to come along to the second annual Barnet medieval festival that the Society was organizing in June 2018 to give a talk and sign books?
It wasn’t a difficult decision to make (once I’d bribed my daughter – whose birthday coincided with the event – with the promise of an evening out in London afterwards). So that’s how I found myself, at an early (for me) hour of the morning of Saturday 9th June making my way through the quiet unsuspecting suburban streets of Barnet towards the Old Elizabethans rugby club.
Driving on to the club grounds was like entering a different world. Yet one with which I should have been somewhat familiar – having researched and imagined medieval battle camps when I was writing The King’s Man. But actually encountering such a camp as it was waking up was new to me. The drifting smell of woodsmoke from cooking fires, the distant clang of hammer on metal as the armourer started work, the colourful array of tents of all shapes and sizes, the flutter of standards, people clad in all manner of medieval garb, from the finest ladies and gentlemen to small children playing before breakfast. I’d been asked to come early to set up my stall before the gates opened to the public – and it was a pleasure to do that and enjoy the atmosphere lovingly recreated by the re-enactors before the invasion of modern visitors.
I’d been a little uncertain when asked to wear medieval clothing for the festival, but it wasn’t long before I was changed and ready in my page’s costume. (The leading character in my books, Matthew Wansford, is himself page at Middleham Castle to King Richard while he’s still Duke of Gloucester, so it seemed appropriate to hire such an outfit for the summer’s events.) Though I was worried about its lack of authenticity, given it came from a theatrical costumier rather than a re-enactment supplier, everyone was far too polite to make any adverse comments and I soon felt very much at home in it.
My stall was set up alongside that of the Barnet Battlefield Society, in a prime position overlooking the arena, so I was lucky enough to be able to watch the re-enactments without leaving it. These re-enactments were of the Battle of Barnet itself, and earlier in the day the second Battle of St Albans (possibly in order to offer some sort of balance in terms of victories for both sides). These were my first re-enactments and also the first at the Barnet Festival itself, and the companies involved – including the Medieval Siege Society, the Wars of the Roses Federation and the House of Bayard – acquitted themselves well. From the first sounds of the drums announcing the muster and the parades of troops, through the powerful cannonades and arrow-storms, to the fierce hand-to-hand fighting – all described for the watching crowds by a lively commentary – it was a stirring experience for the audience. And somehow the soldiers managed it all in the growing heat of the afternoon despite their full armour.
As well as the battles, there were of course a variety of other displays of hand guns and archery, the re-enactors’ camps and plenty of stalls selling authentic (and some less authentic) wares to occupy the many visitors, and medieval music group La Trouvère travelled down from Yorkshire to perform. My own talk – combining a passage from the start of the Battle of Bosworth from The King’s Man with a description of King Richard’s role at Barnet and the development of his ‘black’ reputation under the Tudors – was well attended and received, despite the competing attractions. I hope that a few people went away from the Festival with a different view of the King – or at least questions in their minds about what they thought they knew about him.
Overall, the weekend seems to have been a great success. Upwards of 5,000 people attended what was a free festival, organized in a remarkably short time by a very hardworking group of volunteers. Visitors came from far afield and all appeared to have a fantastic time. I certainly enjoyed it and have put the dates in my diary for next year (8th and 9th June 2019).
Some of my favourite memories are from the latter part of each day – when the dogwalkers who usually frequent the fields arrived for their evening strolls to find battles still going on – among the many children who had bought wooden swords, shields, helmets and bows from the stalls. At one point, the children even banded together into two smallish armies, with one streaming down from their vantage point at the top of the arena field to engage with their enemy below. This perhaps isn’t the way they learn history in school – but I think the festival may well have kindled an enduring interest in the medieval period in many of them.

Many thanks to Alex for writing sharing her experiences with us. Many of you may have met up with her at Bosworth last month or, indeed at Barnet.

Thetford

We know Richard III was first buried (and exhumed many years later) on 25 August and it seems logical, although we don’t know exactly, that John Howard, Duke of Norfolk was interred on the same day. So, it seemed to be the ideal date to visit the 1107 Cluniac Priory, which lies only five minutes from the station. It was a dry day, which is very helpful because Thomas Cromwell’s commissioners were ruthless in implementing the Dissolution and so is the Priory today. The foundations and first foot of the walls remain as well as more at the north end, away from the entrance gate. Norfolk was moved here to join his family a few years after 1485 but before about 1540, when they were taken to St. Michael’s, Framlingham.

The local Wetherspoon, in the market place, bears the Howard heraldic name of the Red Lion and I lunched in there. The walls were festooned with local history – from the Iceni, the Priory building to the Dissolution and the local factories – but I couldn’t photograph these because there were diners in the way. There was a poster about Ayrton Senna, who lived in Attleborough during his Lotus days.

Just round the back was the Dads’ Army Museum, which gave me two ideas about Edward IV. He had a brother with an apparent drink problem and, whilst married, had feelings towards a widow named Grey, both of which apply to Captain Mainwaring.

Will they dig down for St Edmund, do you think….?

murreyandblue

abbey gardens, bury st edmunds

Searching for historic remains seems to be the thing now. More than ever since Richard III. I hope that the work of the folk who went to the Abbey Gardens in Bury St Edmunds on International Dowsers Day will lead to another great discovery.

View original post

An obituary

murreyandblue

Here is the BBC’s official post about Dr. John Ashdown-Hill, who died last Friday. However, his permanent legacy includes these Powerpoint presentations, originally devised so that he can still educate you about Richard, his life, family and era when he first became unwell enough to do so in person. Alternatively, this is the East Anglian Daily Times’ take.

Image: Riikka.

View original post

Newsletter June 2018

MAG Newsletter June 2018

The Court of Requests and Thomas Seckford

murreyandblue

In 1484, King Richard III created a minor equity court to deal with minor disputes in equity; these are disputes where the harshness of common law would be acknowledged by those appointed by the Crown. Equity courts were mostly seen as the Lord Chancellor’s remit, and the split of the Chancery Courts from the Curia Regis happened in the mid-fourteenth century. By the time of King Richard III, the Chancery Court had become backlogged from cases pleading the harshness of the common law, and the Court of Requests was no doubt and attempt to remove minor equity cases from the backlog and free up court time – Richard’s attempt at reducing bureaucracy and better administration.

So successful was the Court of Requests that it survived Richard’s reign, and was formalised by the Privy Council of Henry “Tudor”, the usurper. It was a popular court, because the cost of cases was…

View original post 489 more words

Post Navigation